Austria-based privacy campaign group NOYB announced on Monday that it intends to file a complaint against ChatGPT. The group claims that the flagship AI tool produced incorrect answers, and its creator, OpenAI, was unable to correct these inaccuracies.
NOYB argues that there is no way to ensure the program provides accurate information and raises concerns about where the data used by ChatGPT comes from and what it stores about individuals. According to NOYB, individuals’ personal information must be accurate according to EU law. If a system cannot produce accurate and transparent results, it should not be used to generate data about individuals.
The campaign group cited instances where ChatGPT provided incorrect information about the birth date of NOYB founder Max Schrems. Despite requests for OpenAI to rectify or erase the incorrect data, the company refused, claiming it was impossible. NOYB also noted that OpenAI failed to respond adequately to Schrems’ requests to access his personal data, violating EU law.
Since its introduction in November 2022, ChatGPT has attracted attention for its impressive capabilities. However, the technology has faced criticism and legal action in various countries. Italy temporarily blocked the program, and France’s regulatory authority launched an investigation in response to complaints. NOYB has raised concerns about the regulation of AI by authorities and is pushing for OpenAI to be fined to ensure compliance with EU law.
In conclusion, NOYB’s concerns highlight the importance of ensuring that technology complies with legal requirements when dealing with personal information about individuals. As such, there is a need for increased scrutiny of AI tools like ChatGPT before they are deployed in public use.
The debate over AI regulation is ongoing across Europe and beyond as policymakers seek ways to balance innovation with privacy rights. While some argue that strict regulations could stifle innovation, others argue that strong protections are necessary to prevent harm caused by AI systems.
In light of these concerns, NOYB’s decision to file a complaint against ChatGPT highlights the need for greater transparency from tech companies regarding their products’ accuracy and compliance with legal requirements.
Ultimately, this case serves as a reminder that technology must always prioritize individual rights over corporate profits if we hope for a future where AI can benefit society without causing harm or infringing upon our privacy rights.
+ There are no comments
Add yours